Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Session 8, Restoring Relationships

THIS IS THE BEGINNING of the next seven (7) sessions under "Reclaiming the World."  The next sessions help us consider some more "big picture" pieces of faith journeys and include sessions on Restoring Relationships; The Prophetic Jesus; Evil, Suffering & A God of Love; The Myth of Redemptive Violence; Practicing Resurrection; Debunking the Rapture; and "Reclaiming the World."  Join us on Sunday mornings at 9:00am or on Wednesday evenings at 6:30pm!

FOCUS: There are three Biblical “macro-stories” that shape the whole of the Biblical narrative: Bondage and Liberation, Exile and Return, Sin and Forgiveness. Each representing a different facet of the human  condition, they demonstrate what is necessary for the restoration of relationships on a variety of levels.

Re-Ligio-ed

Rootless. Alienated. Estranged. Meaningless. The human condition can be a desperate mix of questions about the basics of “being.” In fact, the longing for a sense of connection is at the root of the English word, “religion.” The Latin re-ligio means to re-link; to reconnect. To help reconnect, re-link, and restore people to relationship with one another and to the Divine is at the heart of religion’s intended purpose. Our stories, rituals, ceremonies and traditions grow out of our collective effort to systematize our understanding of just what it takes to be “religio-ed.”

At the heart of the Biblical tradition is the notion that truth doesn’t come to us primarily as fact, creed, or scripture. It is best conveyed through story. As our spiritual ancestors endeavored to sort out the process of reconnection, they did so by developing three major themes – what Marcus Borg calls Biblical “macrostories.” For the ancient Hebrews enslaved in Egypt, the problem was bondage. Since what was needed was liberation, the tale of the Exodus became one of the most important stories for ancient Israel. For those removed to Babylon after the destruction of Jerusalem, the problem was exile. The solution was maintaining a sense of identity in a foreign land, and if possible, a journey of return. For those grounded in the institution and rituals of the Temple, the problem was sin and guilt. The solution was forgiveness. Individually and collectively, these stories serve as the thematic wellspring from which stream the major stories of the Biblical tradition.

To receive a complete copy of the text used for the session, please contact Pastor Marj at daytonfirstcong@gmail.com.  It will be sent as an email attachment for your perusal as opposed to printing multiple pages, a stewardship practice. Because of copyright law, we are not able to make the materials available here. Another option would be to purchase a copy of Felten and Procter-Murphy's newly-released book, Living the Questions: The Wisdom of Progressive Christianity from your local bookseller.

Questions to be considered in light of the video and readings:

Describe some of the characteristics of the Exodus story and how it speaks to the human need for liberation from bondage.

What are some of the “isms” and concrete expressions of bondage from which CarcaƱo has been liberated?

How does the Passover Seder affirm that the Exodus story is “true” about us?

List some of the cultural messages that, as a matter of course, subject us to bondage.

Describe some of the characteristics of the story of the Babylonian exile and how it speaks to the human need for a return from exile.

How do the “Priestly” story and Temple sacrifice speak to the human need for forgiveness from sin?

In what ways might the dominance of the Priestly story and the doctrine of the atonement diminish the broader Biblical message?

Bill Nelson claims that Jesus was against the sacrificial system of the Temple Cult of Israel. Explain.

As described by Borg, list the function and benefits of the three different stories in speaking to the diversity of the human predicament.




Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Session 7, Out into the World: Challenges Facing Progressive Christians

FOCUS: There is a reformation afoot in Christianity – a re-visioning of the traditional understandings of Jesus, the virgin birth, substitutionary atonement, and the Christian life as a whole. Long held ideas of divinity and of faith are changing and evolving to reflect 21st century thought and spirituality. Inspired by these fresh insights, progressive Christians can claim a distinctive voice by being in solidarity with the poor, countering the idolatry of wealth, practicing nonviolence, and by seeking justice and inclusivity in a culture dominated by fear.

A Progressive World
“Stagnation in thought or enterprise means death for Christianity as certainly as it does for any other vital movement. Stagnation, not change, is Christianity’s most deadly enemy, for this is a progressive world.”        – Harry Emerson Fosdick (1922)
For medieval Europeans, it was understood that famines and plagues were sent by God as punishment for sin. Wars were divine earthly retribution. Feudalism, absolute monarchy, and slavery were ordained by God. In the not too distant past those seeking medical help submitted themselves to physicians who slit the skin to “bleed” patients and let the bad “humours” escape. The Bible was cited in turning women away from the polls and relegating African Americans to church balconies. The invention of the lightning rod was vehemently denounced by clergy as unwarranted interference with God’s use of lightning.

How the world has changed! Today, we take for granted wireless phones, ease of travel, education for our children, and miracles of medicine. Daily work and life are inconceivable without our computers, cars, comfortable homes, and instant communication. We’ve long-since left the idea of a flat earth and a three-tiered cosmos behind – and we wouldn’t dream of going back a thousand years. And yet many Christians today make it proof of their faith and a litmus test of their relationship with God that they embrace thousand-year-old religious ideas – and are proud of it.

In virtually every field of human endeavor, new discoveries are praised. Not so with religion. In no area of life other than religion is the denial of progress held up as a virtue. Somehow, the way it was in days-gone-by holds a mysterious authority over people. 21st century believers faithfully recite creeds reflecting arcane fourth century questions with little thought given to the political and theological terrain that spawned the creeds in the first place.

When the Bible is held up as a final authority trumping all other arguments, it is good to remember that the early church didn’t have any Bible beyond Hebrew Scripture. It was a small gathering of people who sought a deeper understanding of and relationship with the divine. Across the Mediterranean, they gathered in small communities around the teachings and person of Jesus and thus developed the foundations of what we know as Christianity out of their own experience and insight.

What most people “know” about the Bible or understand about religion today has been cobbled together out of assumptions, insecurity, and long-held half memories that have little basis in rational thought. That being the case, the resistance some people have to expanding their religious horizons can be fiercely irrational. New understandings are feared and discredited: “don’t mess with what I’ve believed since I was a child!”

But even the Bible is full of examples of changing perceptions and descriptions of the divine/human relationship. Not only does the character of Jesus change from one Gospel to the next – sometimes profoundly – but the very nature of the Divine changes over the course of the Biblical story. While wandering in the desert, the Hebrews carried God around in a box. When that proved vulnerable to enemy attack, God was promoted to a throne in the sky above. The God known as Yahweh evolves from a tribal mountain God beating up on Pharaohs and passing down culture-bound rules into a universal God who shows grace to all – a God that Paul had difficulty convincing James, the brother of Jesus, and Peter himself to accept.

The whole of scripture is awash with change, change, and more change. Yet the fallacy that Christianity is a static belief system offering absolute truths for the true believer remains the overwhelmingly predominant message preached and believed by many in the West today.

To receive a complete copy of the text used for the session, please contact Pastor Marj at daytonfirstcong@gmail.com.  It will be sent as an email attachment for your perusal as opposed to printing multiple pages, a stewardship practice. Because of copyright law, we are not able to make the materials available here. Another option would be to purchase a copy of Felten and Procter-Murphy's newly-released book, Living the Questions: The Wisdom of Progressive Christianity from your local bookseller.

Questions to be considered in light of the video and readings:

     According to Varghese, what are the characteristics of being “authentically” Christian?

     If progressive Christians need to “get a message” and be intentional about sharing the faith that we have, what are some of the core points of that message?

     Describe some of the ways Townes suggests that we can “live our faith.”

     According to Mel White, what do we need to “let go” of?

     Why might claiming “what we’re not” be a bad strategy for progressive Christians?

     Elaborate on how being centered in “Spirit and Wisdom” and “Compassion and Justice” express the core values of the Christian Life.

     According to Brueggemann, what are the three definitive marks of the church which have been kept “secret” and for which so many have been hungering?

     Why is “being in solidarity with the poor” often a characteristic of vital faith communities?

     Describe what Flunder calls “the last real blind spot on the Body of Christ.”

     Levine suggests that we “try to see through each other’s eyes” and still reach an agreement that leads to wholeness for real people. Discuss.